Jump to content

Talk:Dandenong Ranges

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Summits

[edit]

The summits section appears to have been created using the altitudes given in the Melway directory maps, where small cross-hairs are given with a number beside them. There are a couple of issues with this approach:

  1. Melway, whilst a fine street directory, is not a topographic map.
  2. A number of these altitudes are given for locations that are not actually summits on the Dandenongs ridgeline, but rather saddle points. For example the "Sherbrooke Summit—488m" appears to be based on Melway Ref 75 C1, but this is actually the saddle between Dunns Hill and the ridge before the Sassafras saddle (Refer to a map with topographic data to verify this, such as https://maps.land.vic.gov.au/lassi/ or MapShareVic http://mapshare.maps.vic.gov.au/MapShareVic/index.html?viewer=MapShareVic.PublicSite&locale=en-AU)
  3. Several of these names are local names, and not in the official VICNAMES database - should this be distinguished?

I would propose replacing this list with a list using heights from Victorian Government Survey Mark Enquiry Service (https://maps.land.vic.gov.au/lassi/SmesUI.jsp) which is the best source I can locate, or from the contours if there is no available survey mark.

  • Mount Dandenong — 630m [DANDENONG ECC J survey mark]
  • Mount Corhanwarrabul — 612m (Burkes lookout and location of transmission towers) [per contour data]
  • Olinda peak - 592m (Range Road, Olinda - named Mt Olinda in older tourist maps) [per contour data]
  • Sassafras peak - 538m (Coolongatta Road, Sassafras) [per contour data]
  • Dunns Hill — 562m [per contour data]
  • One Tree Hill - 500m [per contour data]
  • Tremont Hill - 395m [per contour data]
  • Chandlers Hill - 405m [per contour data]
  • Johns Hill - 419m (Ridge Road, Kallista) [JOHNS HILL ECC 1986 survey mark]
  • Black Hill - 374m (Black Hill Reserve, Selby) [per contour data]
  • Upwey Hill - 278m (Belmont Street, Upwey) [per contour data]
  • Lewis Hill - 298m (Queens Road, Silvan) [per contour data]
  • Nobelius Hill - 320m (Ambrose Street, Emerald) [per contour data]
  • Mount Morton - 275m (Belgrave South) [MORTON ECC A survey mark]

Would this be better as a table?

Summit Name Height Comments Location Source[a]
Mount Dandenong 630m Tallest peak of the Dandenongs Observatory Road, Mt Dandenong DANDENONG ECC J survey mark
Mount Corhanwarrabul 612m Burkes lookout and location of transmission towers Burkes Lookout Reserve, Eyre Road, Mt Dandenong contour data
Olinda summit 592m No official name. Labelled Mt Olinda in older tourist maps. Range Road, Olinda contour data
Sassafras peak 538m No recorded name. Cooloongatta Road, Sassafras contour data
Dunns Hill 562m Location of a number of radio and telephone towers. One Tree Hill Road, Ferny Creek contour data
One Tree Hill 500m Lord Somers Road, Ferny Creek contour data
Tremont Hill 395m No official name. Tremont Hill Track, Tremont contour data
Chandlers Hill 405m Chandlers Track, Tremont contour data
Johns Hill 419m Johns Hill Reserve, Ridge Road, Kallista JOHNS HILL ECC 1986 survey mark
Black Hill 374m Black Hill Reserve, Two Bays Crescent, Selby contour data
Upwey Hill 278m Belmont Street, Upwey contour data
Lewis Hill 298m Queens Road, Silvan contour data
Nobelius Hill 320m Ambrose Street, Emerald contour data
Mount Morton 275m Chaundy Road, Belgrave South MORTON ECC A survey mark
  1. ^ Survey mark and counter data has been accessed from the State of Victoria Land and Survey Spatial Information[1]
  1. ^ https://maps.land.vic.gov.au/lassi/ Land and Survey Spatial Information, State of Victoria (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning). Accessed 15 June 2020.

Tml au (talk) 02:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No comment on this after 18 months. I am going to insert the table.Tml au (talk) 01:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Population figures

[edit]

The section "Settlements in the Dandenong Ranges" appears to contain some incorrect population figures. In particular, the 8000 figure given for Belgrave seems way off the mark. The 2006 ABS gives 4094 for the suburb of Belgrave.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dandenong Ranges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dandenong Ranges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]